Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2189) to modernize Federal firearms laws to account for advancements in technology and less-than-lethal weapons, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 261) to amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prohibit requiring an authorization for the installation, continued presence, operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery of undersea fiber optic cables in a national marine sanctuary if such activities have previously been authorized by a Federal or State agency; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3617) to amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to secure the supply of critical energy resources, including critical minerals and other materials, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
Legislative Progress
Plain English Summary
AI-generatedPlain-English Summary: H. Res. 1042
This resolution is what's known as a "rule" — a procedural measure that sets the terms for how the House of Representatives will debate and vote on three separate bills. It doesn't change any laws on its own, but instead acts as a traffic manager, determining when, how long, and under what conditions the House can discuss each of the three underlying bills.
The three bills this resolution would bring to the floor cover very different topics. The first (H.R. 2189) deals with updating federal gun laws to address modern technology and less-lethal weapons. The second (H.R. 261) would make it easier to install and maintain undersea fiber optic cables — the infrastructure that carries internet and communications data across oceans — in protected marine areas, as long as another government agency has already approved the work. The third (H.R. 3617) focuses on strengthening America's supply of critical energy resources, including minerals used in batteries, electronics, and other technologies important to the energy sector.
Because this is a procedural rule rather than a policy bill, its passage simply means the House is agreeing to move forward and hold structured debates and votes on those three pieces of legislation. It affects members of Congress directly, and indirectly affects anyone who would be impacted by the underlying bills — including gun owners, telecommunications companies, and the energy and mining industries.
This summary is AI-generated for informational purposes. Always refer to the official bill text for legal accuracy.
Latest Action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
February 10, 2026
Sponsor
Committees
Legislative History
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2115-2116)
Feb 10, 2026POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1042, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Neguse demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Feb 10, 2026Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Feb 10, 2026Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2107-2115; text: CR H2107-2108)
Feb 10, 2026DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1042.
Feb 10, 2026On agreeing to the resolution Failed by recorded vote: 214 - 217 (Roll no. 60).
Feb 10, 2026Failed of passage/not agreed to in House On agreeing to the resolution Failed by recorded vote: 214 - 217 (Roll no. 60).
Feb 10, 2026On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 214 (Roll no. 59).
Feb 10, 2026Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 60.
Feb 9, 2026The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617 under a closed rule and provides for one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
Feb 9, 2026The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-490, by Mr. Langworthy.
Feb 9, 2026The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-490, by Mr. Langworthy.
Feb 9, 2026