Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3838) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2026 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3486) to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase penalties for individuals who illegally enter and reenter the United States after being removed, and for other purposes.
Legislative Progress
Plain English Summary
AI-generatedWhat This Bill Does
This legislation is a procedural "rule" bill — meaning it doesn't directly change laws itself, but instead sets the terms for how the House of Representatives will debate and vote on two separate, substantive bills. Think of it as the rulebook that governs how Congress will handle the next steps for those two pieces of legislation. These types of procedural resolutions are a standard part of how the House manages its workload and controls the flow of legislation to the floor.
The Two Bills It Covers
The first bill it addresses (H.R. 3838) is the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2026 — the annual legislation that sets the budget and policy priorities for the U.S. military and defense-related energy programs, and determines how many military personnel will be on active duty. This affects members of the armed forces, defense contractors, and broadly, national security policy. The second bill (H.R. 3486) would increase criminal penalties for people who enter the United States illegally or who return to the U.S. after previously being deported, representing a tightening of immigration enforcement law under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
How It Passed and Who It Affects
This procedural rule passed the House by a very narrow margin of 210 to 207, meaning it was highly contested. By passing this rule, the House essentially gave itself the green light to formally debate and vote on both the defense budget bill and the immigration penalties bill under specific, pre-set conditions. Everyday Americans are indirectly affected because this vote clears the path for two significant policy areas — military spending and immigration enforcement — to move closer to becoming law.
This summary is AI-generated for informational purposes. Always refer to the official bill text for legal accuracy.
Latest Action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
September 9, 2025
Sponsor
Committees
Legislative History
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 43.
Sep 9, 2025Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Sep 9, 2025On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 210 - 207 (Roll no. 243). (text: CR H3907)
Sep 9, 2025Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 210 - 207 (Roll no. 243). (text: CR H3907: 2)
Sep 9, 2025On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 207 (Roll no. 242).
Sep 9, 2025Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3914)
Sep 9, 2025POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 682, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Scanlon demanded the yeas and nays and Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Sep 9, 2025DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 682.
Sep 9, 2025Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3907)
Sep 9, 2025The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3838 under a structured rule and H.R. 3486 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
Sep 9, 2025The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-255, by Mr. Scott, Austin.
Sep 9, 2025The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-255, by Mr. Scott, Austin.
Sep 9, 2025