Back to search
HRES 294On FloorFederalhouse

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

Introduced April 7, 2025Last action April 8, 2025
View official bill

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Referred
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed Chamber
Passed Both
Enrolled
Signed

Plain English Summary

AI-generated

What This Bill Does

This legislation is a procedural "rule" passed by the House of Representatives that sets the terms for debating and voting on four separate measures. Think of it as a scheduling and rules document — it doesn't change any laws on its own, but it opens the door for the House to formally consider and vote on four other pieces of legislation. The House passed this procedural rule by a very narrow margin of 213 to 211.

The Four Measures It Enables

The rule paves the way for action on four distinct items. Two of them would roll back consumer protection regulations issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): one rule that placed new limits on bank overdraft fees charged by large banks, and another that would have applied federal oversight to large digital payment apps like Venmo, Cash App, or PayPal. The third measure would limit the power of federal district courts to issue nationwide injunctions — meaning it would restrict judges' ability to immediately block federal policies while legal challenges play out. The fourth measure would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, which would change existing federal voter registration rules.

Who Is Affected

This procedural vote itself doesn't directly change anything for everyday Americans — its impact comes from which debates and votes it allows to happen. However, the underlying measures it enables could affect a wide range of people: bank customers who pay overdraft fees, people who use digital payment apps, individuals involved in federal lawsuits challenging government actions, and anyone who registers to vote in federal elections. The full impact on these groups would depend on whether each of the four underlying measures ultimately becomes law.

This summary is AI-generated for informational purposes. Always refer to the official bill text for legal accuracy.

Latest Action

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

April 8, 2025

Sponsor

R
Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5]RNC

Committees

Rules reported an original measure

Legislative History

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)

Apr 8, 2025
house

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

Apr 8, 2025
house

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Apr 8, 2025
house

Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)

Apr 8, 2025
house

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.

Apr 8, 2025
house

On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473)

Apr 8, 2025
house

Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473: 2)

Apr 8, 2025
house

On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).

Apr 8, 2025
house

Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.

Apr 7, 2025

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.

Apr 7, 2025
house

The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.

Apr 7, 2025

The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.

Apr 7, 2025