Back to search
H8058IntroducedRhode Islandhouse

Makes it unnecessary to prove that a person's transmission of electronic communications be for the sole purpose of harassment before being found guilty of cyberstalking or cyberharassment.

View official bill

Plain English Summary

AI-generated

Rhode Island Cyberstalking/Cyberharassment Bill

This bill would change the legal standard required to convict someone of cyberstalking or cyberharassment in Rhode Island. Under current law, prosecutors must prove that a person sent electronic messages — such as texts, emails, or social media messages — with the sole purpose of harassing someone. This bill would remove that "sole purpose" requirement, meaning a person could be found guilty even if harassment was just one of several reasons behind their communications.

This change would affect anyone involved in cases where electronic communications are used to harass or stalk others. For victims, it could make it easier to obtain a conviction, since prosecutors would no longer need to prove that harassment was the only motivation behind the messages. For people accused of these crimes, the legal bar for conviction would be lower, meaning that communications sent with mixed intentions — such as a combination of personal, business, or other reasons alongside harassment — could still result in criminal charges.

The bill is currently in the early stages of the legislative process. It was introduced and referred to the House Judiciary Committee, which has recommended holding it for further study rather than moving it forward immediately. This means lawmakers want more time to review and debate the bill before deciding whether to advance it toward a full vote.

This summary is AI-generated for informational purposes. Always refer to the official bill text for legal accuracy.

Sponsors

J
Justine CaldwellD
H
Hagan McEnteeD
J
Julie CasimiroD
J
June SpeakmanD
S
Susan DonovanD
R
Rebecca KislakD
T
Tina SpearsD
M
Matthew DawsonD

Legislative History

Committee recommended measure be held for further study

Mar 24, 2026

Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (03/24/2026)

Mar 20, 2026

Introduced, referred to House Judiciary

Feb 27, 2026