Back to search
H7551IntroducedRhode Islandhouse

Establishes the criminal offense of real estate title fraud. Allows municipalities to refuse to record “suspicious documents” from persons who are not trusted submitters. Also creates penalties for real estate title fraud.

View official bill

Plain English Summary

AI-generated

Rhode Island Bill Summary: Real Estate Title Fraud

This bill creates a new crime in Rhode Island called "real estate title fraud." In simple terms, title fraud happens when someone illegally forges or falsifies documents to make it appear they own a property that actually belongs to someone else — allowing them to potentially sell it, take out loans against it, or transfer ownership without the real owner's knowledge. By formally naming this as a criminal offense and setting clear penalties, the bill aims to give law enforcement stronger tools to prosecute people who commit this type of fraud.

The bill also gives local municipalities (cities and towns) new authority to protect against fraudulent documents being filed with their offices. Specifically, it allows local recording offices to refuse to accept and record documents that appear suspicious, particularly when they are submitted by individuals who are not considered "trusted submitters." Trusted submitters would likely include recognized professionals such as licensed attorneys or title companies — people with established, verifiable identities and credentials.

This bill would affect several groups of people. Homeowners would benefit from stronger protections against having their property stolen through paperwork fraud. Local government recording offices would gain new responsibilities and decision-making authority over what documents they accept. Real estate professionals would need to understand how the "trusted submitter" designation works. And anyone who commits title fraud would face new criminal penalties under state law.

As of now, the bill has been introduced and referred to the House Judiciary Committee, which has scheduled it for a hearing. The committee has recommended it be held for further study, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote.

This summary is AI-generated for informational purposes. Always refer to the official bill text for legal accuracy.

Sponsors

B
Brian KennedyD
J
Joseph SolomonD
K
Katherine KazarianD
S
Samuel AzzinaroD
J
John EdwardsD
A
Arthur CorveseD
M
Mia AckermanD
H
Hagan McEnteeD
P
Patricia SerpaD
M
Megan CotterD

Legislative History

Committee recommended measure be held for further study

Feb 11, 2026

Introduced, referred to House Judiciary

Feb 6, 2026

Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (02/11/2026)

Feb 6, 2026