Prohibits the courts from setting cash or surety bail on any misdemeanor offense but permits the court to set reasonable non-monetary conditions of bail to assure the defendant's presence in court as required and to protect the community.
Plain English Summary
AI-generatedPlain-English Summary
This Rhode Island bill would change how courts handle bail for people charged with misdemeanor offenses — which are lower-level crimes like petty theft, minor drug possession, or simple assault. Currently, judges can require a person to pay cash bail or use a surety bond (money posted through a bail bondsman) to be released from jail while awaiting trial. This bill would eliminate that option for misdemeanors entirely, meaning a judge could no longer require someone to pay money to get out of jail on a misdemeanor charge.
Instead of cash bail, courts would still be allowed to set non-monetary conditions to ensure the person shows up for their court dates and to protect public safety. These kinds of conditions might include things like check-ins with a probation officer, travel restrictions, no-contact orders, or electronic monitoring. The goal is to allow courts to still manage risk without requiring a cash payment.
This bill would most directly affect people in Rhode Island who are arrested and charged with misdemeanor offenses. Supporters of similar policies often argue that cash bail disproportionately keeps low-income people in jail simply because they cannot afford to pay, even for minor charges. Critics of similar measures often express concerns about public safety and ensuring defendants appear in court. This bill does not affect felony charges — cash bail could still be set for more serious crimes.
As of now, the bill has been introduced in the House and referred to the House Judiciary Committee, which has recommended it be held for further study, meaning it has not yet moved forward toward a vote.
This summary is AI-generated for informational purposes. Always refer to the official bill text for legal accuracy.
Sponsors
Legislative History
Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Apr 2, 2026Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (04/02/2026)
Mar 27, 2026Introduced, referred to House Judiciary
Jan 21, 2026